Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Trauma is a major health problem throughout the world. Trauma is the most common cause of death and the most common cause of disability in adults and young adults. Abdominal trauma accounts for 7-10% of all trauma sufferers and causes severe trauma. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the Revised Trauma Score (RTS) to the mortality of abdominal trauma sufferers.
Methods: This study was an observational analytic study with a retrospective design to assess the relationship between Revised Trauma Score (RTS) and mortality in abdominal trauma patients treated in the Emergency Department of RSUP DR. Mohammad Hoesin Palembang. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS-23 devices using the chi-square method and Mann Whitney
Results: 144 abdominal trauma patients studied. The mean age was 28 ± 11,340 years, 97.4% were male, 64.0% of patients had abdominal trauma. The average RTS value was 7.429 ± 1,001. The mean value in the group of patients who died was 6.628 ± 0.795 and the mean value of the RTS in the group of patients who did not die was 7.459 ± 0.795. There was a significant relationship between RTS values and mortality in abdominal trauma patients (p = 0.0.03).
Conclusion: the results of this study indicate that RTS is a meaningful assessment system in predicting death in abdominal trauma patients
Keywords
Article Details
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.