Main Article Content
Introduction: Breast cancer is one of the most common neoplasm occurs in women. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC) and Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC), to reduce tumor size (down-sizing), and further allowing breast-conserving surgery to be performed. Accurate markers are needed to prevent impractical chemotherapy that allows patients to receive definitive surgery in a timely manner. Previous study showed neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was superior in predicting long-term outcomes over PLR. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the NLR value and neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer at Dr. Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang.
Methods: This study is a prognostic test of the NLR accuracy to predict the response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. The study included 113 patients as study subjects.
Results: The obtained NLR cut off point value was ≤ 2.92 with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 92.2%. The diagnostic measures of the NLR prognostic test had sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 93%, Positive Predictive Value of 97%, Negative Predictive Value of 82%, and accuracy of 93%. There is a significant relationship between NLR and chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: There is a significant relationship between NLTR and chemotherapy response. NLR can be used as a predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response with a good degree of accuracy.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3.Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.